"Black Eye Network"


A few weeks ago Matt Drudge revealed on this news site THE DRUDGE REPORT scenes of the upcoming CBS miniseries “The Reagans” that got friends and allies of the former President pretty upset. Scenes included Reagan showing signs of Alzheimer’s years before he was diagnosed with the disease, Nancy being a pill popping, Reagan fearing that he was the anti-Christ before breaking down and crying, and a scene when Reagan saw a news report on AIDs saying “People who live in sin shall die in sin”. Reagan was often criticized about not doing anything about AIDs in the 1980s when it hit.

Now as I reported on here earlier the networks are in the middle of sweeps. CBS may have at first thought the “buzz” would be good for ratings. However when more and more scenes were revealed the pressure started to mount on the network. CBS started to fear potential sponsors bailing on the program. They also feared a boycott of some of the sponsors of the mini-series and perhaps feared the network itself would suffer a decline in ratings during the November Sweeps. Sweeps is a time when the networks kiss the butts of their advertisers.

A few days ago the mini-series that was supposedly pitched as a love story was coming across as more of a politically slanted version of the former president’s life. Another reason people thought perhaps things were being blown out of proportion was that fact that Barbara Streisand ( an high profile liberal loud mouth) was one of the key figures in the creative team behind the project. CBS finally blinked and made broadcast television history and pulled the plug on the mini-series. It was the first time that a network canned a program for political reasons. The miniseries will air (more likely as just long film) on SHOWTIME which is also owned by VICAOM. The film was edited and certain controversial scenes were cut for the CBS airing before it was canned. However everyone of those scenes are going to be restored when it airs on SHOWTIME sometime in 2004.

The liberals are calling CBS spineless for giving into political pressure. Streisand claims the network’s move was politically motivated and it is a “sad day for artistic freedom”. She went on to claim Shakespeare was horrible historian but wrote entertaining plays despite falsifying facts and the kings of England. Apparently Liberals can reference past people and events and claim that is the way it always was and always should be when it benefits them to illustrate a point. I haven’t seen the movie which has her husband James Brolin starring as Reagan but I doubt it Shakespeare.

She has a good point that such artistic freedom should not be squashed. However there is a thin line between that and just wanting to make public figure look like a jerk for political game. Where do you the draw the line? Claiming he said stuff that was never mentioned. Couldn’t they have consulted people closer to the family like they did for the Amy Smart and Sniper films? Unfortunately a vast majority of viewers would gobble up everything they saw as fact not artistic freedom. There is a responsibility that wasn’t there 10 years ago for tv movies to try to stick to the facts. This film itself was political not artistic. Do not believe for a second that this movie was made for anything other then to give the Ronny a black eye.


Now people who were against this thing (at posting time they are already taking aim at Showtime) make some points I don’t agree with either. They think a movie shouldn’t be made about Reagan because he is senile and can’t defend himself. Okay it is in bad taste I would admit, and one wonder why they couldn’t wait for him to buy the farm (there isn’t an election coming up is there?) before telling his story. What if he was dying of cancer or AIDs would that be in worse taste? However many a film has been made about the dead who last time I checked couldn’t defend themselves. JFK has come off as a jerk many times.


Matt Drudge thinks the bizarre anti-christ scene was the turning point that got people thinking it was strange. The CEO of CBS claimed it was “unfairly harsh” towards the Ronald and his wife. Honestly I think he was just looking out for the wallet of his network. For some reason television (puzzling everyone people just don’t seem to be watching tv) viewers have being MIA the last thing he wants to do is alienate his viewers. So his move is more motivated by money than anything else.

Showtime will air the movie, because they don’t have to worry about sponsors. VICACOM might even get more people to shell out money for it and all the scenes will be in place. I honestly think CBS can win the sweeps month easily without the mini-series (predicted order top=CBS, ABC, NBC, FOX= bottom) maybe it was just to hot for network television although thanks to BONO apparently the F-bomb isn’t. It is funny because it was delivered as a satire I wouldn’t be blogging about this right now. Are conservatives being too protective of their icon? Perhaps they are being to blind to his flaws. I don’t know if he said any of these things really. I know has heard he never talked about AIDS once the whole time he was in office although I could never really prove that.

I don’t know it is a sad day for artistic freedom. Matt Drudge simply put out transcripts from the movie and people got upset. A LOT of people got upset by this film. Their voices were just too loud. Maybe if the movie showed Reagan’s famous TEAR DOWN THIS WALL moment or put some more good to balance out the negative stuff it wouldn’t have seen as such a blow, making him more of a tragic figure. I don’t see this opening the door to bowing to political pressure on a regular basis however I don’t see network TV existing in 10 years they way that we know it now. Did CBS make the right choice? I honestly think I would have to see the movie to make a fair statement on that. Maybe I will get it off NETFLIX when it come on DVD. Perhaps I will maybe I can get on of those old Reagan chimp movies to come the same week and have a double feature.