"Black Eye Network"
A few weeks ago Matt Drudge revealed on this news site THE DRUDGE REPORT scenes of the upcoming CBS miniseries “The Reagans” that got friends and allies of the former President pretty upset. Scenes included Reagan showing signs of Alzheimer’s years before he was diagnosed with the disease, Nancy being a pill popping, Reagan fearing that he was the anti-Christ before breaking down and crying, and a scene when Reagan saw a news report on AIDs saying “People who live in sin shall die in sin”. Reagan was often criticized about not doing anything about AIDs in the 1980s when it hit.
Now as I reported on here earlier the networks are in the middle of sweeps. CBS may have at first thought the “buzz” would be good for ratings. However when more and more scenes were revealed the pressure started to mount on the network. CBS started to fear potential sponsors bailing on the program. They also feared a boycott of some of the sponsors of the mini-series and perhaps feared the network itself would suffer a decline in ratings during the November Sweeps. Sweeps is a time when the networks kiss the butts of their advertisers.
A few days ago the mini-series that was supposedly pitched as a love story was coming across as more of a politically slanted version of the former president’s life. Another reason people thought perhaps things were being blown out of proportion was that fact that Barbara Streisand ( an high profile liberal loud mouth) was one of the key figures in the creative team behind the project. CBS finally blinked and made broadcast television history and pulled the plug on the mini-series. It was the first time that a network canned a program for political reasons. The miniseries will air (more likely as just long film) on SHOWTIME which is also owned by VICAOM. The film was edited and certain controversial scenes were cut for the CBS airing before it was canned. However everyone of those scenes are going to be restored when it airs on SHOWTIME sometime in 2004.
The liberals are calling CBS spineless for giving into political pressure. Streisand claims the network’s move was politically motivated and it is a “sad day for artistic freedom”. She went on to claim Shakespeare was horrible historian but wrote entertaining plays despite falsifying facts and the kings of England. Apparently Liberals can reference past people and events and claim that is the way it always was and always should be when it benefits them to illustrate a point. I haven’t seen the movie which has her husband James Brolin starring as Reagan but I doubt it Shakespeare.
She has a good point that such artistic freedom should not be squashed. However there is a thin line between that and just wanting to make public figure look like a jerk for political game. Where do you the draw the line? Claiming he said stuff that was never mentioned. Couldn’t they have consulted people closer to the family like they did for the Amy Smart and Sniper films? Unfortunately a vast majority of viewers would gobble up everything they saw as fact not artistic freedom. There is a responsibility that wasn’t there 10 years ago for tv movies to try to stick to the facts. This film itself was political not artistic. Do not believe for a second that this movie was made for anything other then to give the Ronny a black eye.
Now people who were against this thing (at posting time they are already taking aim at Showtime) make some points I don’t agree with either. They think a movie shouldn’t be made about Reagan because he is senile and can’t defend himself. Okay it is in bad taste I would admit, and one wonder why they couldn’t wait for him to buy the farm (there isn’t an election coming up is there?) before telling his story. What if he was dying of cancer or AIDs would that be in worse taste? However many a film has been made about the dead who last time I checked couldn’t defend themselves. JFK has come off as a jerk many times.
Matt Drudge thinks the bizarre anti-christ scene was the turning point that got people thinking it was strange. The CEO of CBS claimed it was “unfairly harsh” towards the Ronald and his wife. Honestly I think he was just looking out for the wallet of his network. For some reason television (puzzling everyone people just don’t seem to be watching tv) viewers have being MIA the last thing he wants to do is alienate his viewers. So his move is more motivated by money than anything else.
Showtime will air the movie, because they don’t have to worry about sponsors. VICACOM might even get more people to shell out money for it and all the scenes will be in place. I honestly think CBS can win the sweeps month easily without the mini-series (predicted order top=CBS, ABC, NBC, FOX= bottom) maybe it was just to hot for network television although thanks to BONO apparently the F-bomb isn’t. It is funny because it was delivered as a satire I wouldn’t be blogging about this right now. Are conservatives being too protective of their icon? Perhaps they are being to blind to his flaws. I don’t know if he said any of these things really. I know has heard he never talked about AIDS once the whole time he was in office although I could never really prove that.
I don’t know it is a sad day for artistic freedom. Matt Drudge simply put out transcripts from the movie and people got upset. A LOT of people got upset by this film. Their voices were just too loud. Maybe if the movie showed Reagan’s famous TEAR DOWN THIS WALL moment or put some more good to balance out the negative stuff it wouldn’t have seen as such a blow, making him more of a tragic figure. I don’t see this opening the door to bowing to political pressure on a regular basis however I don’t see network TV existing in 10 years they way that we know it now. Did CBS make the right choice? I honestly think I would have to see the movie to make a fair statement on that. Maybe I will get it off NETFLIX when it come on DVD. Perhaps I will maybe I can get on of those old Reagan chimp movies to come the same week and have a double feature.
Friday, November 07, 2003
Wednesday, November 05, 2003
"Losers"
Street beat Katz (KICKED HIS ASS)and Tommy lost in Haddonfield at least I think so because his name didn't appear anywhere on the offical results that I found on the internet. I can imagine he didnt get ANY votes though. If I find his final totals I will post them here.
Keep it hear at Tucker's World for the the final numbers on that race. If you get your news from this blog then well thats just sad.
Well it might be intresting if the FBI finds anyhting on Street. Oh well Philly made their bed.
Oh and for the record I didn't vote for anything, felt mildly guilty.
Street beat Katz (KICKED HIS ASS)and Tommy lost in Haddonfield at least I think so because his name didn't appear anywhere on the offical results that I found on the internet. I can imagine he didnt get ANY votes though. If I find his final totals I will post them here.
Keep it hear at Tucker's World for the the final numbers on that race. If you get your news from this blog then well thats just sad.
Well it might be intresting if the FBI finds anyhting on Street. Oh well Philly made their bed.
Oh and for the record I didn't vote for anything, felt mildly guilty.
Monday, November 03, 2003
“Message to Readers”
Well it is SWEEPS months for the major networks the time when all the networks (and FOX) bring out their big guns so they can justify how much the charge for commercials for their shows. So look for big TV Movies, important plot related stories and shameless gimmicks on your favorite shows. In honor of that I usually have a SWEEPS month of my own. I have no idea who reads this blog and I don’t have a traffic reporter like Drew does for TERMINUS (Drew can you help me out with that man?), but still when they have SWEEPS I try pull out all the stops to get people clicking back to this link and procrastinating during their workday. I want to try to update more this month. So sit back and get ready for some hopefully memorable articles in the next 4 weeks, and then it is back to the same old mundane crap with random and frequent days upon days with no updates.
Dan K emailed me and told me that the SUV headlights are not any brighter it is just the fact that they are at the right height to blind me. He knows a lot more about cars than I do so I guess he is right. He went on to wish death upon anyone who drives an SUV anyway.
TUCKERS WORLD ENDORSES CANDIDATE IN THE PHILLY MAYOR RACE!
“Indecision 2003”
Tomorrow is Election Day. Sadly that might actually be news to most my readers. Not that I can talk I don’t have any interest in the election of the mayor of my own town. However I have written about two mayor races that I can’t vote in. The Philadelphia election and the Haddon Heights election only because there is 21 year-old local filmmaker running for mayor.
Okay first the Philly election. The campaign trail is in the homestretch and judging by the latest polls Mayor John Street might as well make his victory speech on Good Day Philadelphia tomorrow before the polls even open. Katz has been resorted to referencing the DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN debacle. Usually a sign that you are desperate for a miracle and the election will be a landslide for the opposition.
The last few hours we have seen Sam Katz bellow out some tunes in Italian and John Street brought out former Vice President AL GORE which was enough to make local liberals harder than getting south bound on 295 during rush hour. Streets gain in the polls leaped again last night the polls results are strikingly different than before the BUG SCANDAL at the time Katz had a slight lead. Don’t worry though if it looks to be close you can rest assure that Ed Randall will be driving around with a van picking up homeless people and paying them to vote for Street. A Democratic tradition in the city of brotherly love. Not that the Katz campaign has halos around their heads.
Katz supposedly has some unions behind him, but Street has far more. Basically a core of the voters are Union leaders who intimidate union members into voting for a particular candidate. Unions are key. I would also imagine that Katz’s wife will vote for him along with the most of the remaining white people that live in the city.
Well the night before I TUCKERS WORLD is giving an endorsement to Sam Katz. Unfortunately for Katz none of my readers live in Philly hell very few of them are even registered to vote. However even the recent tactics by the Street’s cronies and the fact the many Philly businesses are hoping the Delware to South Jersey than are jumping to Philly (just ask CHUCK) I think Katz is the better candidate. I think Katz is more business savy and the Philly economy needs that.
Meanwhile right up the White Horse Pike Tommy Avallone who I know by association is running for mayor. Tommy who at one time worked at the Cinemark movie theater got together with some friends and made some local movies. I stumbled upon this films because a friend of mine Mike Hadfield has minor roles in them.
“Wasted Apples” was followed by “Small Kid Tank Top” neither film indicated that Tommy has any future in film making but he is under the impression he would be a good mayor. His story made national news (long after I broke the story) appearing on both CNN.com and the DRUDGE REPORT. Here is the latest statement made by Tommy released on his website.
“Everyone from Haddon Heights VOTE FOR ME!, Everyone that isn't from Haddon Heights tell everyone you know in Haddon Heights to VOTE FOR ME!, Everyone that isn't from Haddon Heights that doesn't no anyone from Haddon Heights, make a friend with someone in Haddon Heights and tell them to VOTE FOR ME!, if you are to young to vote get your brother, sister, mother, father, uncle, aunt, grandparents, and neighbors to VOTE FOR ME!, Everyone should get more involved, everyone should get into poltics, everyone should VOTE FOR ME! I may be a bad speller, I may have bad grammer, I may not use spell check, But I will make one hell of a mayor. So inclusion, VOTE FOR ME!!!!!!!”
Well it is SWEEPS months for the major networks the time when all the networks (and FOX) bring out their big guns so they can justify how much the charge for commercials for their shows. So look for big TV Movies, important plot related stories and shameless gimmicks on your favorite shows. In honor of that I usually have a SWEEPS month of my own. I have no idea who reads this blog and I don’t have a traffic reporter like Drew does for TERMINUS (Drew can you help me out with that man?), but still when they have SWEEPS I try pull out all the stops to get people clicking back to this link and procrastinating during their workday. I want to try to update more this month. So sit back and get ready for some hopefully memorable articles in the next 4 weeks, and then it is back to the same old mundane crap with random and frequent days upon days with no updates.
Dan K emailed me and told me that the SUV headlights are not any brighter it is just the fact that they are at the right height to blind me. He knows a lot more about cars than I do so I guess he is right. He went on to wish death upon anyone who drives an SUV anyway.
TUCKERS WORLD ENDORSES CANDIDATE IN THE PHILLY MAYOR RACE!
“Indecision 2003”
Tomorrow is Election Day. Sadly that might actually be news to most my readers. Not that I can talk I don’t have any interest in the election of the mayor of my own town. However I have written about two mayor races that I can’t vote in. The Philadelphia election and the Haddon Heights election only because there is 21 year-old local filmmaker running for mayor.
Okay first the Philly election. The campaign trail is in the homestretch and judging by the latest polls Mayor John Street might as well make his victory speech on Good Day Philadelphia tomorrow before the polls even open. Katz has been resorted to referencing the DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN debacle. Usually a sign that you are desperate for a miracle and the election will be a landslide for the opposition.
The last few hours we have seen Sam Katz bellow out some tunes in Italian and John Street brought out former Vice President AL GORE which was enough to make local liberals harder than getting south bound on 295 during rush hour. Streets gain in the polls leaped again last night the polls results are strikingly different than before the BUG SCANDAL at the time Katz had a slight lead. Don’t worry though if it looks to be close you can rest assure that Ed Randall will be driving around with a van picking up homeless people and paying them to vote for Street. A Democratic tradition in the city of brotherly love. Not that the Katz campaign has halos around their heads.
Katz supposedly has some unions behind him, but Street has far more. Basically a core of the voters are Union leaders who intimidate union members into voting for a particular candidate. Unions are key. I would also imagine that Katz’s wife will vote for him along with the most of the remaining white people that live in the city.
Well the night before I TUCKERS WORLD is giving an endorsement to Sam Katz. Unfortunately for Katz none of my readers live in Philly hell very few of them are even registered to vote. However even the recent tactics by the Street’s cronies and the fact the many Philly businesses are hoping the Delware to South Jersey than are jumping to Philly (just ask CHUCK) I think Katz is the better candidate. I think Katz is more business savy and the Philly economy needs that.
Meanwhile right up the White Horse Pike Tommy Avallone who I know by association is running for mayor. Tommy who at one time worked at the Cinemark movie theater got together with some friends and made some local movies. I stumbled upon this films because a friend of mine Mike Hadfield has minor roles in them.
“Wasted Apples” was followed by “Small Kid Tank Top” neither film indicated that Tommy has any future in film making but he is under the impression he would be a good mayor. His story made national news (long after I broke the story) appearing on both CNN.com and the DRUDGE REPORT. Here is the latest statement made by Tommy released on his website.
“Everyone from Haddon Heights VOTE FOR ME!, Everyone that isn't from Haddon Heights tell everyone you know in Haddon Heights to VOTE FOR ME!, Everyone that isn't from Haddon Heights that doesn't no anyone from Haddon Heights, make a friend with someone in Haddon Heights and tell them to VOTE FOR ME!, if you are to young to vote get your brother, sister, mother, father, uncle, aunt, grandparents, and neighbors to VOTE FOR ME!, Everyone should get more involved, everyone should get into poltics, everyone should VOTE FOR ME! I may be a bad speller, I may have bad grammer, I may not use spell check, But I will make one hell of a mayor. So inclusion, VOTE FOR ME!!!!!!!”
Sunday, November 02, 2003
“Blinded By the Light”
It doesn’t bother me so much that SUVs guzzle gas, but their insanely BRIGHT head lights irk me.
So the other night I was driving to my girlfriend’s who lives roughly 20 minutes from my house. It was dark out being nighttime and all and a fairly raining night. Then behind me comes an SUV.
The head lights on this sucker are so bright that I can actually see the glare off the puddles on the street behind in my mirror. Now I know it is supposed to be a “utility” vehicle and all but is it necessary for them to illuminate the car of the motorist in front of them. Christ what they want me to do put on shadow puppet show on for them or something?
I recall when I first started driving one of the worst things you could do as a driver is pass a car, or be behind a car with your high beams on. Now what difference does it make when if the normal headlight of an SUV severely blinds me and has on occasion actually given me a headache. Now I know that I can turn my mirror so that is blocks out the insanely ridiculous headlights, but I never like to that that because it messes up my reference to how much a distance that this soccer mom as on me. Nor does it stop my car from looking like the Clark Griswold’s home.
Now I really don’t know the practical reason for such bright headlights. Where the hell are this SUVs going? I mean this light is so bright that sometimes on a dark road I am checking for little green men and missing time when it first comes up behind me.
I know I am supposed to be impressed by the power of their vehicles but is it necessary for them blind me to the point that my retinas are detached by the time I get to my girlfriends house? I was lucky I could tell the difference between Liza and her dog Denver by the time I get to her home, because I could see was a bright light in front of me.
So my advice is to drive about 25 MPH if an SUV is behind you in two lane road. You will likely irate them and perhaps they will pass you. If any of my readers have people in their lives with SUVs get them headlight covers for approaching holiday season get them “head light” covers. If anyone doesn’t know what they are they look really cool but pretty much render your headlights useless.
It doesn’t bother me so much that SUVs guzzle gas, but their insanely BRIGHT head lights irk me.
So the other night I was driving to my girlfriend’s who lives roughly 20 minutes from my house. It was dark out being nighttime and all and a fairly raining night. Then behind me comes an SUV.
The head lights on this sucker are so bright that I can actually see the glare off the puddles on the street behind in my mirror. Now I know it is supposed to be a “utility” vehicle and all but is it necessary for them to illuminate the car of the motorist in front of them. Christ what they want me to do put on shadow puppet show on for them or something?
I recall when I first started driving one of the worst things you could do as a driver is pass a car, or be behind a car with your high beams on. Now what difference does it make when if the normal headlight of an SUV severely blinds me and has on occasion actually given me a headache. Now I know that I can turn my mirror so that is blocks out the insanely ridiculous headlights, but I never like to that that because it messes up my reference to how much a distance that this soccer mom as on me. Nor does it stop my car from looking like the Clark Griswold’s home.
Now I really don’t know the practical reason for such bright headlights. Where the hell are this SUVs going? I mean this light is so bright that sometimes on a dark road I am checking for little green men and missing time when it first comes up behind me.
I know I am supposed to be impressed by the power of their vehicles but is it necessary for them blind me to the point that my retinas are detached by the time I get to my girlfriends house? I was lucky I could tell the difference between Liza and her dog Denver by the time I get to her home, because I could see was a bright light in front of me.
So my advice is to drive about 25 MPH if an SUV is behind you in two lane road. You will likely irate them and perhaps they will pass you. If any of my readers have people in their lives with SUVs get them headlight covers for approaching holiday season get them “head light” covers. If anyone doesn’t know what they are they look really cool but pretty much render your headlights useless.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)